September features
Sun shines on our profession
The return of our Summer Reception was graced with perfect conditions.
How about Hague?
There are benefits to be reaped from this registration system, says William Burrell.
OAPI: IP law update
Martin Chinnery summarises the changes that came into effect this year.
30 going on partner
Looking to speed into a senior role? Charlotte Wilding shares her suggestions.
The case for change
Geoff Steward reflects on why momentum is building to shake up the IPEC.
How to be a better writer
Tips for producing top‑class content.
September case comments
Test of faith
[2022] CSIH 28, The Tomatin Distillery Company Ltd v The Tomatin Trading Company Ltd: Iain Rutherford distils the crucial points arising from this decision.
Court opinion is clear
[2022] EWCA Civ 552, Lifestyle Equities CV and another v Amazon UK Services Ltd and others: This decision also has wider implications for distribution consent, suggests Giles Parsons.
Invictus is conquered
O/448/22, Invictus Games Foundation v Invicta SpA: A royal connection wasn’t a convincer, writes Amelia Skelding.
Saving face
[2022] EWHC 1127 (Ch), Montres Breguet SA and others v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd: Catherine Byfield tells how a big watch brand won the day on the issue of watch-face apps.
Heart to heart
[2022] EWHC 941 (IPEC), Match Group LLC and others v Muzmatch Ltd and others: Emilia Petrossian explains how one dating site mark met its match.
Oatly wins again
B 3 117 184, Oatly AB v Jean-Louis Klein: Decision confirms an established stance, reports Erika Coccia.
September regulars
Reaching everyone
Andrea Brewster points the way to a truly inclusive workplace.
Insider: September 2022
The coming months offer opportunity.
The Trade Mark 20: Olusegun Oyesanya
Q&A: Olusegun Oyesanya
